|
Post by So what on Aug 22, 2018 19:33:58 GMT 1
Hearing rumours she's allegedly pregnant.
|
|
|
Post by Hmmm on Aug 23, 2018 4:51:53 GMT 1
Where did you see these rumours? I'm assuming it's his.Well she has been mia for a while so I wouldn't be shocked.
|
|
|
Post by So what on Aug 23, 2018 15:41:47 GMT 1
A fan of hers on twitter told me. There's some recent pics of her baking - there's a bump in the apron.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 2, 2018 1:09:07 GMT 1
I was checking out Homeless Ashes as Andrew is in it and noticed Hannah has been replaced with Nadia Lamin as Avi.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 2, 2018 22:00:24 GMT 1
The info about Homeless Ashes came from its imdb page.
* Checked out recent photos of her. Face seems fuller in a healthy way. Posing with leaning, leg, and baggy clothes similar to when she was ill. Could be to hide pregnancy. Baking pics-that's probably the friend Victoria I mentioned earlier in this thread (learning this stuff in early 2013-made some cupcakes she brought to March 2013 comic con). It seems these were more Adam's daughter Leah learning by making this standard cake that the company teaches with. * Hope Paul and his new functions band success. * Mariama tweeted!- rare these days * I suspected some spying on us here as early as fall 2015. We know from Adam and Someone that Paul is here secretly while Adam's mom is as well. He also makes reference to twitter fake accounts and blocking. (For whoever it was that asked that a few posts back.) * Still waiting for the truth from all of them............................ *
Oh while I'm here and don't know if Andrew even knows about this site (or is he another one secretly viewing/posting?)...some things we did see re: Stanley. Many photos of him and Hannah taking pics of each other with Stanley, both pictured with Stanley's head lying on their stomachs while they are reclining, pics at beach, national park, running in bts shots from "Little Larry", Andrew holding him and a beige/yellow dog toy, Andrew holding him after giving him a bath, on set with Andrew...I'm sure Andrew has copies of vets records just as Hannah has for him. My point was more to the effect that he and Hannah never brought Stanley to cons. Once when asked, early 2013 I think, they said he was staying with Lucy (Brown) for the day. After Hannah brought him to a con, they asked at another one where he was...he's at Andrew's house was the response. (Andrew was at the con.) Lots of pics of Stanley now with fans, Mr. IT, my IT's dad, etc. when with Hannah all of a sudden...nothing from Andrew's side, except few from Andrew and Mariama since Hannah and Andrew's 2013 split. Very different. They always seemed so together. Since 2013 they seemed to be complete opposites. Why? Was their "togetherness" a pr stunt or is this new stuff from Hannah the pr stunt? It seems to me more likely the latter. that's my perspective. * I'd still like to know exactly what the comic con policy is regarding bringing pets. Seems rather unclear. I've already gone into this earlier in this thread so I won't spell it out again.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 2, 2018 22:11:51 GMT 1
Brain freeze again. * I forgot to write that a few years ago I had looked at the King Charles breed online. From what I recall, the average lifespan is 9-10 years, so I wasn't surprised to hear Stanley as he was that age.
|
|
|
Post by You on Sept 3, 2018 18:13:25 GMT 1
I don't think Paul is hiding on here. Not sure why anyone thinks he is
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 4, 2018 10:35:10 GMT 1
Scroll back a couple of pages. "Someone" said he's here secretly and badmouthing Hannah.
* Actually start from p.1.
* That should read that I wasn't surprised to hear Stanley died as he was at that age. *
If we want to discuss from reason and logic and the objective truth, the pregnancy is the result of the marital act outside of matrimony (thus wrong). If there is a baby on the way, we are thus looking at an illegitimate child. And, if he was validly married to Leah's mother, it is also adultery. Same would go for all the other stuff it seems nearly everyone is doing these days.(I am giving everyone the benefit of the doubt as I don't have the background information regarding previous relationships.) "Laws" don't make it right if the "laws" aren't serving justice which serves truth. So, no truth no right living. * Hannah and Andrew said in their Ok engagement interview way back when about wanting to marry in a church, they should clarify if they were being honest since they apparently are not now "christians". Andrew did not marry in a church and Hannah is doing buddha/yoga stuff which is incompatible with Christianity. The Mindfulness program is also incompatible being as it is based on buddhist spirituality. * * I'll give you an absurd example so you can understand what I mean about all of this:
* The object I will use is the one everyone understands not some other one. Now, all governments make laws regarding this object. All books, schools, etc teach the same thing as the laws. Every single person believes what is taught and on the books (written in law) regarding this. After reading and thinking, apply this to whatever topic, object, etc...in real life.
* The moon is made of cheese.
* Is it true? Absolutely not. Why not? All the laws, governments, schools, books, people say it is true....BUT the truth is that none of them have the power, ability, or authority to make a non truth true.Period. You're just living a lie. It doesn't matter what they say, you believe or feel, what the books say. It matters what the truth is. Our minds are meant to learn the truth and live it. Reason and sensible information will inform us of that truth. Not all of it as we are only human. * I expected a certain degree of pr nonsense as this is common. I did not expect what we've ended up with over the past number of years. "The Duchess of Sussex" has been engaging in massive doses of pr lies going back years. Hers all contradict themselves. The dish soap letter was a school project for example. She is a huge fan of the late Princess of Wales and knew very well who Prince Harry was. The con going on is deep and is costing the UK taxpayers quite a lot of money. Don't buy into all this nonsense. In other words, similar to what plays out with entertainers (to varying degrees). The DoS is being bankrolled by some powerful backers. She's still merching...double dipping in that she's getting stuff from designers via Jessica Mulroney for free and then billing the Prince of Wales for the full cost which she and JM then pocket. Nice, huh? * In this scenario here, for example, the dozens of fans tore into Adam in 2015 for days on twitter egging him on and berating him on FB (the way he did things was wrong, yes, but some of these people as ET stated herself didn't even know he existed). They were go Paul. Then she got back together with Adam. They were all yeah Adam again. Then the 2016 "incident". Then it was go Mr.IT. Now it's go Adam again. Yet, they haven't publicly apologized for tearing into Adam in 2015. Why not? Everyone should be apologizing publicly for what they've done (as I've done repeatedly and others here have done). We wanted the truth because we knew we weren't getting it. And they don't seem to see that they're just blowing whatever direction the Hannah wind blows regardless. Clarifications were not issued regarding errors in articles either which means they are approving those errors. * We exist to know truth. If we don't live that we are wasting our lives. * If you want to debate what I've stated, please do so calmly and civilly (no "feelings" or profanity). Your arguments should be based on objectively true principles. This reminds me of Alice in "Alice" in which Andrew played Hatter. She was telling the people in the casino to think and wake up.
Sorry, one final thing. In early 2014 I believe, Hannah tweeted or rt'd about a young cousin of hers who was ill (a little girl around age five. The cousin's account also tweeted something about "cousin Hannah". Anyway, the little one was ill from what I remember. I hope she is doing well.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 24, 2018 6:09:55 GMT 1
So it's confirmed they're expecting a girl in December. Two miscarriages. Been there myself a couple of times ( add a few more weeks on) with many I know having been through that as well. The miscarried babies aren't in heaven unless baptized. Assuming one was with Andrew (or possibly Paul) so even more questions. Been together five years, for example, means cheating with Paul and Mr. IT plus any ones on Adam's side. If he was validly married, this is still adultery and the child is illegitimate. (Same would go for Andrew/Mariama, Lucy and Adam, Leah's mother and her new man etc...) We're dealing with the truth. Still waiting. (I do hope the baby is ok.)
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 24, 2018 9:29:30 GMT 1
I lost my last post, so quickly, is there any clarification in the full article as to when these miscarriages occurred and who the other father is? The men suffered these losses as well. People tend to forget that. I hope the other father was informed of this being made public before the article came out.
*
I remember back in late 2013 I came up with Hannah and Andrew suffering the loss of a baby which played a part in their split. No idea about that but that memory just came back. * I wish Hannah and Adam the best (and the other father) well. * Animals are pets not human beings. We are pet owners not pet moms/dads.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 24, 2018 22:14:52 GMT 1
OK Magazine has a bit more info. online.
First miscarriage was a few years prior to the second one so that seems to mean Andrew is the other father. This could be some of the strangeness we saw in 2011-2012 between them. Second miscarriage was Feb. 2014 with them splitting a few months later according to the article. That seems to be a typo as she got her implants in August 2013 with symptoms starting six months later meaning Feb. 2014. Adam was taking care of her then. It was 2015 when they split and he sold the story which appeared in June 2015. That's when I started posting here. There's still no mention her times with Paul or Mr. IT during the past five years.
* Conception date for this baby was a couple of weeks prior to the boxing match meaning due date end of Nov./ early Dec. Since the due date is listed as Dec., it'll be the first half of the month (based on the info. in the article).
|
|
|
Post by MG on Sept 26, 2018 22:33:54 GMT 1
The Hannah fan site has a scan of the full article with pictures if you haven't seen the issue yet or don't live in the UK. * The article says both 2014 and 2015 for their brief split. Didn't they say somewhere that they symptoms started about six months after she got the implants? (Maybe it was in that tv interview they did?)The article says the engagement and symptoms were both in Dec. 2013. No mention of her time spent with Mr. IT in 2016. *
Won't speak about Paul and doesn't name the father of the child lost in the first miscarriage (which seems to be Andrew based on the vague date given). * The interview sounds like Hannah/Andrew ones which for old S Club fans probably sounds like Paul/Hannah ones.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Oct 1, 2018 21:18:21 GMT 1
The comments about the Duchess of Sussex are only a small part of the big picture of what's happening there.
I glanced at some PR info. while looking into that situation. It seems people can pay for twitter followers. The companies can look at detailed analyses of such things and determine what if would mean for their demo they want to market to and such including how many are just fake followers.
Some in the PR world have also stated that stars will plan out things even years in advance, including meeting people, holding hands, kissing at such and such a place, engagements, splits, etc... * It looks as though their PR strategy is to play the loving couple hoping we'll all forget all the previous stories that were sold to the public regarding their lives and Paul's...It seems to not be working as there were few comments on the pregnancy article on the various sites and the comments that were made weren't too thrilled. Same for Tina's on DM. Same for the implant article earlier on DM which had about twice as many comments as this current one. One about a normal person going through the same thing got very few comments. It probably would have been just as effective to have used Hannah and Adam's social media inc. the twitter linked to their FB page for the implant illness. Most people simply aren't going to pay attention to interviews or articles on something that has nothing to do with them. The fan base would pick it up and spread it as well. *
Fans...will people hire you if you can sell people on buying their product? What about colleagues who will lose out on income from people not spending time and money on the project when a certain person or persons is part of the project. (As an aside, SciFi channel is starting to air "Primeval" again this month.)
|
|
|
Post by MG on Oct 3, 2018 20:08:34 GMT 1
It should be SyFy (UK) for "Primeval" if any are interested.
I brought up something near the start of this thread about what some people on other sites had discussed which led to a bit of a discussion on here as well. It was about how Hannah does whatever the guy's she's with does. It really does feel like we're late 2013 early 2014 again. Just replace Adam's Yogabody stuff with this new business. By the way the only director thing I can think of for her is when she and her dad were the board of directors for a company with mint(y) in the name. Does anyone remember that?
Provided all of this is actually fans conversing and not people posting to string us along some more or in some other way mess with us, does any one believe any of them will actually tell us the truth about all of this or that they even really actually care about us other than as meal tickets for them?
There will no doubt be boatloads of more gifts for the baby along with the ones they already give for the person and the dog. Do they all really not see how those on the outside looking in see this as buying a person off? Spend all of this time and money praising and buying for their celeb in exchange for a handful of minutes and likes here and there from their celeb (whichever celeb they're doing this with) is supposed to make the "relationship" more than simply fan/celeb which is really all it is.
Sorry to Hannah, Andrew, and Adam on the losses of Baby Potts and Baby Thomas. They're having a life of natural happiness and no suffering in the lowest level of hell since they were not baptized. A great many others are there as well.
Again, we're dealing with The Truth and not a bunch of sentimentalism or emotionalism. Our minds are meant for truth. That's what we must find and live by. That is why these truths matter. Anything not true hinders us from living fully truthfully and thus we struggle to reach the end humans were created for.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Oct 4, 2018 5:16:46 GMT 1
I didn't put that very well. The babies are in the outermost ring of hell.
|
|