|
Post by Me on Apr 18, 2018 10:11:03 GMT 1
I’m not trawling through previous posts to dig up questions, like I said, if you want to ask something in particular for me to prove to you it’s me then I’d be happy to do so. Then I won’t have my mother reading this board and reporting it back to me when I don’t want to hear it, will you mother! We did this morning for awareness, nothing else, and so far we’ve spoken to a number of women deciding against implants now because they saw it. So that is nice to know and all we wanted. We haven’t even decided on all the content yet for the website so the idea we did it for exposure is nonsense. We’re not even ready with website content never mind capitalising on new leads from a breast implant interview topic. We did this morning because the daily mail promised an awareness piece and then changed it to sensationalism last minute and printed ia load of inaccurate rubbish without consent. As a true piece of shit journalist would. As for Hannah’s symptoms, if you’re categorically told that getting ill from implants is impossible by a doctor, then that is a lie and immoral and she/we have every right to be pissed off. We don’t want sympathy, we want plastic surgeons to stop lying about the risks. Hannah’s illness symptoms were horrific at times and at best made her act out of character, at worst she was unrecognisable. That’s what you can’t account for. She barely remembers much of 2014-2016 due to being ill and heavily medicated. How about just giving her a fucking break instead of posting some of the utter speculation on here in a not so pleasant to read manner. Ask me questions or don’t, I don’t really care, it’s of no particular importance to me but some of you on here seem to care hugely and I’d like the inaccurate speculation to stop if I can set you straight. But Post again about it not being me and I just won’t bother, I’ve written enough now. Thanks Adam “Adam” First of all, noone is disputing that Hannah was ill because of her implants,and of course we are all glad she is on the up. You will not find anyone saying anything different on hear. As “Who” said we just want to discuss the inaccuracies which have been written. If they are indeed inaccuracies which (by default) are painting you to be he “baddie” in all of this, then surely you’d want that to?? I will happily apologise to you if you do turn out indeed to be Adam Thomas. However - like I sed above - we don’t want more inaccuracies and lies, just like u don’t. So I propose the following. We all on here would love to have the conversation with u if u are who you claim to be. But we don’t want more sensationalism/lies - not do you. So if u do the following over the next couple of days (deadline Sunday), we will believe you and I will apologise for thinking you aren’t. 1) Hannah to post, on twitter, a picture of Lola in her dog bed/basket with a note that says “hello twitter” with 3 kisses and a smiley face 2) You to write, on twitter, a tweet - wording of ure choice - praising Hannah for the interview on Monday. Neither of these should be 2 difficult or out of the ordinary for ppl who arent aware of this discussion board. If you don’t, clearly we’ll know you’re just some pathetic “fan” trying to get your 5 mins!
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Apr 18, 2018 16:41:43 GMT 1
I’m going to retweet our interview from this morning, hopefully that will suffice. It’s 16.41 I’m doing it now
|
|
|
Post by Me on Apr 18, 2018 17:07:57 GMT 1
Adam
Firstly, I have seen ure tweet and, as promised, I apologise for doubting that it was you messaging. As I said, none of us want more speculation & lies so it was important that we established that.
In terms of questions - Like a previous poster, I am copying and pasting them for you. I havent written these myself so as “Who” said, don’t shoot the messenger!
1. Are Hannah and Adam going to apologize to the UK taxpayers and officials for wasting everyone's time and pay the UK taxpayers back for the court case? 2. Have you apologised to those you were rude to when you hacked Hannah's account in 2015 and wrote vile things to/about? If not, why not? 3. There are at least two fans now that I've seen that were blocked when they questioned Hannah/Adam last May about being back together. Why? 4. Does she actually have any sort of qualifications etc. To be giving this sort of advice? {regarding health and fitness} Or, if it's just a front for Adam using her name to get himself more business and recognition. In which case, aside from his personal fitness stuff, what qualifications does he have to be offering advice on nutrition etc? 5. I thought the article about the assault said there were witnesses. Now Han's saying it didn't happen. But something musta happened for there to be witneases? 6. What happened in 2006 with Paul, Hannah, and Andrew? 7. What happened in 2011 with Hannah and Andrew (in particular during "The Belle's Strategem")? Why the tweet from Holly in 2015 when Adam's story broke? 8. What happened in 2013 with Hannah and Andrew and where does Adam (or anyone else) fit in there? 9. What is the "change" many of us saw in Hannah starting around 2012? It isn't maturity or the illness. Thankfully we do not have to add the health problem has been resolved. 10. What is the truth about Hannah and Adam during 2015-present? Domestic violence charge and now (in this DM interview) she's making him out to be St. Adam to go along with her St. Hannah?We have another problem now, though, as she stated the altercation in 2016 didn't happen. So the witnesses, the texts, the police investigation she was cooperating with, the hearing and subsequent trial at Kingston Crown Court, the acquittal due to the witnesses not showing up, and the disappearance of the texts, not to mention the UK taxpapers costs for these things was all apparently a group hallucination. Seriously? 11. Who do u think is Paul? And why?
We all await your response.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Apr 19, 2018 7:16:10 GMT 1
Dear Adam,
I actually did believe you were who you stated without the tweet you did for the other posters.
Thank you for replying.
I don't actually have too many problems where you are concerned. The twitter feud you, Hannah, and Paul did where you were acting like a bunch of two year olds throwing a temper tantrum, the June 2016 incident, you (and Ryan, the fans, Mr. IT and his father, etc.) all parading Stanley around as if he belonged to you being the primary problems. [Sorry to sound harsh, but for some of us who are longtime fans, that was really offensive. If we rarely even saw Andrew posting about Stanley and nothing from his immediate family, it left a bitter taste in our mouths. A "how dare they" or "who do they think they are" kind of thing. That is probably on Hannah as well. Anyway...] As I stated previously, I did follow you and Hannah when she and Andrew split. I believe you and felt that something had happened that caused you to lash out. (Note: the way you lashed out was wrong.) Having dealt with a number of persons with serious health issues, both mental and physical, and my husband in this line of work, I am familiar with what was said concerning 2014-2016. I will give you a pass on about 90% of that time frame. * I did not question your qualifications. I know you've been in the business, for about 20-25 years. My feelings were just a deja vu it's 2013-2014 all over again with the two of you. People did question if she had qualifications then. I assume she stopped giving advice because she didn't have them, which appears to be the case since "someone" I think it was said she now does. * That said, my main problem is that I question pretty much all of the past 12 years where Hannah is concerned now. I don't have time at present to write about in, perhaps in a few days time. * I really do wish all of you the best. This is not a personal attack on anyone which I'll explain later. Also, as much as you may be able to answer some questions posed, this is really far more about Hannah, Paul and Andrew which you are not able to answer. I do not want you being her mouthpiece and just telling us whatever she tells you. As you have no first hand knowledge of Paul and Hannah's 2006 split, for example, you can't speak for them. All parties need to come clean about their parts in the mess that has been left festering like a wound that was not tended to leaving it to cause permanent damage. * I have to go for now. I will post when I can. And, thank you again for addressing some of these issues.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Apr 19, 2018 14:18:05 GMT 1
I will answer all your questions, just need some time to write a detailed reply. Just quickly as an initial and emotional response. I spent hours upon hours of my time caring for Stan, running him round the park for miles and miles to run off the excess fat he would put on every time he spent even 4 weeks with Andrew. And he died in my arms in February unfortunately there was nothing more I could do and it was already stressful for him because his care was starting to require hours per day from me whilst Hannah was ill and he was being heavily medicated. So I’m telling you that whether you like it or not, I loved Stan and invested a lot of time in his health over the years, a damn sight more than Andrew and certainly enough to take photos with him if I felt like it or ended up in one with him. Andrew is a complete tit, I’ve given it almost 5 years before finally drawing that conclusion but not a word has been spoken to him for over a year, not even during joint photo shoots, not one single word. All instigated by him. Not even a word after poor little stan died. And as for an apology to the uk taxpayer! Lol you should be getting an apology from every CUNTstable involved. What an absolute disgrace. We had been in the A&E at the hospital that morning from 3am til 8am and Hannah was in agony when we got back with cystitis, I was trying to get her home and she felll over crying, an idiot driving past called the police and reported something different. The police then convinced Hannah to agree I pushed her over and there you have your high profile assault case for the pathetic little man that calls himself a police officer. What exactly does he protect? Not the tax payers money. After leading Hannah down the garden path and NEVER having any witnesses. They disregarded my statement saying Hannah was mentally ill and coming off various medications and disregarded the fact that she had to seek professional help 2 weeks later. The real person at fault though was our plumber amazingly enough. Bringing alcohol round during the day to an unwell person whilst I was at work and filling Hannah’s mind with all sorts of rubbish whilst she was coming off 5 different mental health medications, this was causing the only problem there was. On the day of the hearing after receiving a letter from Hannah telling them what really happened, the cps offered my barrister a deal for a guilty plea, despite being in possession of a letter exonerating me completely. And they call it a JUSTICE system. Yeah right.
There are very few nasty or evil people about, even the main policeman in question was just an attention seeking plonker more than anything else and I think that is something to bear in mind. If the story doesn’t make sense or points to someone behaving very irrationally, you probably don’t have all the details. Or mental health could be an issue.
|
|
|
Post by Hannah on Apr 20, 2018 1:33:45 GMT 1
Just one question for me & it’s really quite simple, why do you care so much about the personal details of other people’s lives? Just please answer me that and maybe you’ll help me understand what gives you such an obsession in other people business & to be so quick to judge other people’s situations. That’s all. Hopefully you’ll give me an insight into the workings of a mind who dedicates “quite” or as it appears possibly a “substantial” amount of time into asking for the intricacies of other people “private” lives. Many thanks! I look forward to your reply. I’m sure it’ll be very insightful Xx
|
|
|
Post by Me on Apr 20, 2018 8:44:15 GMT 1
Just one question for me & it’s really quite simple, why do you care so much about the personal details of other people’s lives? Just please answer me that and maybe you’ll help me understand what gives you such an obsession in other people business & to be so quick to judge other people’s situations. That’s all. Hopefully you’ll give me an insight into the workings of a mind who dedicates “quite” or as it appears possibly a “substantial” amount of time into asking for the intricacies of other people “private” lives. Many thanks! I look forward to your reply. I’m sure it’ll be very insightful Xx Firstly, to Adam - thank you for your reply. I look forward to hearing your (as you sed) “less emotional response”. “Hannah” - whilst I appreciate that this might be u, I’m sure u can understand my scepticism. So, as Adam did, would u be able 2 prove it’s u by posting a pic of Lola in her dog basket/bed with a note saying “hello twitter” with a wink and smiley face? Then I’m happy to explain!
|
|
|
Post by Me on Apr 20, 2018 10:10:15 GMT 1
To clarify “Hannah”, can u make the picture a pic of Lola in her dog basket/bed with a handwritten note saying “hello twitter” with a wink and smiley face?
Just so we can make sure it’s u posting it and not Adam hacking ure account again.
Cheers
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Apr 20, 2018 15:19:46 GMT 1
Hmmm what is your emotional attachment/involvement to this whole story “me”? Your tone is concerning. You see when asking Hannah to verify herself, rather than just asking her to do that you had to include “to make sure it’s not Adam hacking your account again”. And you can’t get enough of that subject. From the style you can see you didn’t have to but wanted to include that as a slight which looks suspicious at best. It screams bitterness/anger. And you know we’re stronger than ever because we went on tv together on monday and Hannah has been posting photos for months. So what’s the story? Who are you? How would you know accounts were blocked if it wasn’t you? Because they were fake accounts not fans that were blocked, oops! Careful you’re going to give yourself away! LOL I’m not explaining myself and neither is Hannah to someone with that view on things, it’s not healthy and whilstvim not going to speculate who you are, I have a BLOODY good idea.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Apr 25, 2018 1:09:45 GMT 1
Sorry it has taken so long to get back to this. * Will you people please stop acting like spoiled children throwing tantrums to get your way? All of you (Adam, Hannah, Paul, etc). * As for the June 2016 incident, that is a plausible explanation. Can you see why people are having issues with that since all that has been reported is what has appeared in print? As for Stanley, that's Andrew's place to respond.
* Regarding fans: Why do you want fans? Why do you ask them to bid on your items on ebay or pay money to see you at cons? Pay for selfies, autographs, and pics of/with you? All the PR stuff is for...?I'm not going to get into all of this again. I'm tired of sounding like a broken record. You sold us stories about your lives. * It seems celebs are more interested in "yes" men. * * * Perhaps one day when all of you can be objective you can read through this site and get fan perpectives of these things. * We don't have to buy you or your stuff. We can just walk away. That is what I did in 2015. I'm just checking in to see if we've been told the truth about these stories we were sold. *
One more thing. The censoring keeps happening. This isn't about us and this little site. This is about the public. These stories were for public consumption. They need to be dealt with publicly and individually. Having all of you get together in cahoots with one another to issue some vague statement won't resolve this. Each of you needs to tell your part truthfully on your social media or via the papers. One can be complicit by silence as well. (All it takes for evil to triumph...)
|
|
|
Post by MG on May 2, 2018 0:55:33 GMT 1
Perhaps putting things a different way will make things easier. *
A person is responsible for what they have done, said, etc. or not done, said, etc. Since these stories in print and on social media are saying varying things, who is responsible for what? For example, Hannah has said she cheated on all her boyfriends in an interview during her S Club years. Since then, she's been with Paul, Andrew, Adam, Mr. IT, and anyone else we don't know about (if anyone). She has been publicly accused of cheating by Paul and Adam while another person has accused her of cheating on Andrew, and Adam may have had something to do with her split with Andrew. She should only be held accountable for the cheating she has done not for any that she's being accused of but has not done. Thus, this should be cleared up truthfully so the public does not believe her guilty of all these incidences unless she's actually guilty of all of them. If she is not guilty of these, then those publicly accusing her of these actions should be publicly making amends for their wrongs committed against her in which case they are liars. Then there is the possibility that these are just PR stunts or money grabs. Since she has admitted to prior cheating, the public cannot rule any of these other accusations out. * As we stated from the early days, 1. The men held responsible for what they've done 2. Hannah held responsible for what she's done 3. Hannah's health restored * There are fans who are showing signs of blind allegiance. They feel whatever makes "their celeb" happy or is what "their celeb" wants is what they go with. The truth doesn't seem to matter. The past doesn't seem to matter. This is very dangerous. (If that is ok, then we can let the Nazis and Stalin's followers off the hook, right?) * I would post the same for any fandom. * Yes, this seems minor, but if you're ok with this muddying of the truth, then you can't complain about others doing the same thing. * It is simply wrong. The right thing to do is to correct errors. This is why we are some of the stupidest and most enslaved people who have ever lived and civilization is not just in its death throes, but heading towards destruction at breakneck speed. The truth is just a plaything to people anymore. The problem is the truth doesn't change. People are just living a lie.
|
|
|
Post by MG on May 2, 2018 6:01:33 GMT 1
I presupposed people would understand the Hannah cheating scenario. In case people don't know here's a bit more detail. * Hannah during S Club while with Paul said she'd cheated on every boyfriend except one, which we assumed was her current one (Paul). We don't know if her and Andrew's couple of weeks dating in 1997 is part of this or if our assumption that the except one was Paul is correct.
* * If anyone happens to be interested, "Princess" went home last week. ( She was three weeks last Thursday.) She has holoprosencephaly.
|
|
|
Post by Lu on May 8, 2018 17:42:05 GMT 1
Guess we ain't gettin answers then?
|
|
|
Post by MG on Jun 8, 2018 1:27:29 GMT 1
It's three years ago this month since I first posted on this board. * Some things we do know: fake accounts, blocking people, some of them here under fake names= deceitful and manipulative. * The public will get answers when they feel like answering (as it would only take each of them about five minutes to answer the questions) and it suits a purpose while making them look good and us look like horrible people. Again. * Total waste of time and money on these "celebs" and their ilk.
|
|
|
Post by Lu on Jun 22, 2018 19:58:08 GMT 1
Who's here usin false names??
And agree on waste of time + money. It's all fake for the fans.
|
|